| Gliese 436 c | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Edasich dK star
Number of posts : 2295 Location : Tau Ceti g - Mid Latitudes Registration date : 2008-06-02
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 9:25 am | |
| No, please. Non-detections are the naughtiest things XD | |
|
| |
tommi59 Jovian
Number of posts : 596 Age : 46 Location : Baile Atha Cliath Registration date : 2010-07-31
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 12:24 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
tommi59 Jovian
Number of posts : 596 Age : 46 Location : Baile Atha Cliath Registration date : 2010-07-31
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 12:25 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Edasich dK star
Number of posts : 2295 Location : Tau Ceti g - Mid Latitudes Registration date : 2008-06-02
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 3:12 pm | |
| - tommi59 wrote:
- I hope venus like planet
Have you crossed fingers? | |
|
| |
Lazarus dF star
Number of posts : 3337 Registration date : 2008-06-12
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 4:04 pm | |
| Actually low-mass planets in systems which have had significant migration ought to have their compositions altered by the movement of material through the system. Presumably they would have more icy material in their makeup thanks to the migrating planet bringing it in from regions further out in the disc. | |
|
| |
Sirius_Alpha Admin
Number of posts : 4320 Location : Earth Registration date : 2008-04-06
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 4:11 pm | |
| Do icy sub-Earths form very easily in such a disk? I've always imaged planets dominated by water ice to be super-Earths... but I can't think of a good reason for this to be so*, and may just be a result of the discussion of the super-Earths to date.
*Edit: Low mass terrestrial planets should have a hard time migrating through the disk, right? _________________ Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
| |
|
| |
Edasich dK star
Number of posts : 2295 Location : Tau Ceti g - Mid Latitudes Registration date : 2008-06-02
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 4:13 pm | |
| - Lazarus wrote:
- Actually low-mass planets in systems which have had significant migration ought to have their compositions altered by the movement of material through the system. Presumably they would have more icy material in their makeup thanks to the migrating planet bringing it in from regions further out in the disc.
Even a low-mass planet (I assume <0.5 Me or within 0.3 Me)? I mean, can supercritic ice be still retained by such a tiny planet and in such close orbit? Maybe a carbon-chondrite based world rather supercritic-icy one? Better to speculate after (putative) announcement. | |
|
| |
Sirius_Alpha Admin
Number of posts : 4320 Location : Earth Registration date : 2008-04-06
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 8:09 pm | |
| http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.0755No planet ;P! - Quote :
- we conclude that the earlier candidate transit signals resulted from correlated noise in the EPOXI and Spitzer 8 µm observations.
_________________ Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
| |
|
| |
Borislav Jovian
Number of posts : 564 Registration date : 2008-11-12
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 6th September 2010, 9:58 pm | |
| Of course a little harsh, but it shows once again how difficult it is to discovery a small planet. Before that was. http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.4707But let's wait for the results of Kepler. | |
|
| |
Borislav Jovian
Number of posts : 564 Registration date : 2008-11-12
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 7th September 2010, 3:23 am | |
| I understand correctly, that the anticipated period of the candidate was only 2.1071 days? | |
|
| |
Sirius_Alpha Admin
Number of posts : 4320 Location : Earth Registration date : 2008-04-06
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 7th September 2010, 1:47 pm | |
| - Borislav wrote:
- I understand correctly, that the anticipated period of the candidate was only 2.1071 days?
Approximately. - Quote :
- We further uncovered evidence for a 0.75 RE transiting planet, in a orbit close to a 4:5 resonance with GJ 436 b...
The orbit would be interior to Gliese 436 b: - Quote :
- Second, there is also the small possibility of an occultation of GJ 436c by GJ 436b.
_________________ Caps Lock: Cruise control for 'Cool'!
| |
|
| |
Lazarus dF star
Number of posts : 3337 Registration date : 2008-06-12
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c 7th September 2010, 2:30 pm | |
| Sirius_Alpha gets the Nostradamus points. Then again it is impressive to see how far the detection technology has come, what with detections of sub-Earth radius planets being possible. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Gliese 436 c | |
| |
|
| |
| Gliese 436 c | |
|